GreenasSky A gambol in the goodies by Sloan Nota

Deep Pattern

 4 Koons vacs

 

Look at these four Jeff Koons sculptures.  What do you see?   The more attention you pay the more specific you can be.  Size, color, shape, configuration…  Oddly, the first thing I see is in the diagram below these.

clockwise from top:

  • •   New Shelton Wet/Dry Doubledecker, by Jeff Koons     via Museum of Modern Art
  • •   New Hoover Convertibles, Green, Red, Brown, New Shelton WetDry 10 Gallon Displaced Doubledecker, by Jeff Koons     via allartnews
  • •   New Hoover Deluxe Shampoo Polishers, New Shelton Wet/Dry 5-Gallon Displaced Quadradecker, by Jeff Koons           via exhibitioninquisition
  • •   New Hoover Convertibles, New Shelton Wet/Drys 5-Gallon Doubledecker, by Jeff Koons    via Astrup Fearnley Museet

I see abstract designs and I see the designs as potential patterns.  I’m pattern-hungry, a quirk of the brain.  For example if we simply tile out the two right-hand examples we get these two different patterns.  (Sketches, not to scale.)  Koons’ upper right is our only example where he varies color, hence the extra tones here.  His lower right is the only one with reclining forms.

These artworks are simple to dissect visually and therefore handy in explaining some abstract notions about art.  And they let us see that the abstract patterns can represent big banks of vacuum cleaners, yes.  But they could equally represent toothbrushes or sounds.  They could be plants in a formal garden.  They could be the ratio of chocolate chips to pecans in your favorite recipe.  Math.

What we’re looking at today is what happens in the arts when you map content onto a pattern.

________________________________________________

What if you complexify your elements and increase their number?  Structured Studio Situation by Danish artist Tommy Støckel shows you one delightful possibility.  Paper, styrofoam, balls, what have you.  Configured, repeated and repeated.  Sarah Sze in army boot camp?  But look at how wonderfully the white rectangle in the middle helps to excite the overall design and yet is a pattern variation within the whole.

Støckel is a meticulous visionary.

All four views of Structured Studio Situation by Tommy Støckel at Location One, New York     via Støckel’s website

________________________________________________

We said a pattern could be built of sounds — Ravel’s Bolero is a fine example.  Or here’s a diagram for bell-ringers in a steeple that tells them who rings next.  The very animated GIF below (30 frames )is from the same source.

Bell-ringing chart and animation both from James Bryant, University of Texas at Austin.    via his webpage about campanology.

Patterned sound.  Which brings us to the work of Gabriel Shalom, a German videomusician whose artistry impresses me.   I remember it, I ponder it.  Shalom’s patterning units are short video clips.  Here’s what he makes of them.

Object Oriented — Rafael, by Gabriel Shalom      via his vimeo page

 

Object Oriented — Giles, by Gabriel Shalom      via his vimeo page

________________________________________________

This blog takes more than a passing interest in notions of patterning.  We’re pattern-making, pattern-seeking animals.  So are orcas, robins, dancing bees.  It’s fundamental, mighty, often transparent — and can be a wonderful lens on the fruits of creativity.

 

look further

Gabriel Shalom

Tommy Støckel

A near-oops with an Oom-pah-pah

  • I was going to start this post with this line:The syllables oom-pah-pah may conjure up a tuba for you — because what looks like nonsense is actually a pattern we recognize.  Because I was about to attribute it to John Philip Sousa I looked it up.  Good thing.  Wikipedia says:Oom-Pah-Pah” is a lively and somewhat risqué song from Lionel Bart‘s musical Oliver!, sung by Nancy and the crowd at the “Three Cripples” tavern. The word “oom-pah-pah” is seemingly used euphemistically to refer to both intoxication and fornication; however, as the song points out, the word’s meaning is only as dirty as the listener interprets it. 
This article was posted in art, contemporary art, new media, pattern and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments with the RSS feed for this post.Post a Comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
-->

2 Comments

  1. tricia
    Posted July 5, 2013 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    It all comes down to patterns. Everything can be broken down or traced back to a pattern of some sort. Music nature man universe microscopic oceanic nothing is too big or too small to discern the pattern if you have the desire to see it (you can’t see the forest for the trees comes to mind). Here is a great gallery exhibit: http://broadmuseum.msu.edu/exhibitions/pattern-follow-rules
    I tell people I am terrible at math yet I love patterns as you do and I think everyone fascinated with Nodewerk. I forget about patterns on a daily basis, when I’m working or whatever and then something like your marvelous post happens and I see again. Oom Pah Pah. yeah.

    • Posted July 5, 2013 at 4:50 pm | Permalink

      Yes, pattern pattern everywhere. And thanks for the link to an intriguing show — Scrap Tapestry 1–6! Pae White’s a new fave.

Post a Comment

Your email is kept private. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers:

%d bloggers like this: